What is the difference between social relationship and personal relationship ✅ Tốt
Thủ Thuật về What is the difference between social relationship and personal relationship 2022
Khoa Minh Hoàng đang tìm kiếm từ khóa What is the difference between social relationship and personal relationship được Cập Nhật vào lúc : 2022-12-26 10:20:10 . Với phương châm chia sẻ Kinh Nghiệm về trong nội dung bài viết một cách Chi Tiết 2022. Nếu sau khi đọc tài liệu vẫn ko hiểu thì hoàn toàn có thể lại Comments ở cuối bài để Ad lý giải và hướng dẫn lại nha.Relationships play a central part in people's lives, and a number of exciting interdisciplinary perspectives have recently emerged to shed new light on what it means to be in a relationship with another human being. This volume offers an authoritative yet accessible examination of a wide variety of these perspectives, drawing from a broader than usual range of material and including considerable reference to clinical contexts and case-studies.
Nội dung chính Show- Why is it important to distinguish between professional and social relationships?What are the characteristics of social relations?What is the difference between a personal relationship and a relationship?What does it mean to be in a relationship?What is the meaning social relationship?What are the importance between personal and social relationship?What is an example of a personal relationship?What is an example of a social relationship?
Overall, this book provides an introduction to the cutting edge of research about human relationships and interactions, engaging readers in a debate central not only to academic researchers and clinicans but to their own lives.
This is the course text for The Open University course Social Psychology: Personal Lives, Social Worlds (D317).
Jerome Bruner
Foreword
Dorothy Miell and Rudi Dallos
Introduction
Exploring Interactions and Relationships
Alan Radley
Relationships in Detail
The Study of Social Interaction
Rudi Dallos
Creating Relationships
Kerry Thomas
The Psychodynamics of Relating
Rudi Dallos
Change and Transformations of Relationships
Dorothy Miell and Rosaleen Croghan
Examining the Wider Context of Social Relationships
Conclusions
Dorothy Miell and Rudi Dallos
READINGS
Robert Hinde
Gender Differences in Close Relationships
Arlene Vetere
A Gender Sensitive Perspective on Personal Relationships
Michael Argyle
The Experimental Study of Relationships
Richard Stevens
A Humanistic Approach to Relationships
Graham Allan
A Sociological Perspective
`[This book has] a lively style of presentation... The team has achieved an admirable overall coherence in representing the range of ideas, methodologies and modes of analysis that will be found in this area of social life... The organization of this book through theme-based chapters is logical and developmental, and its material is well communicated... accurate, concise and contemporary. Its special features... would certainly be attractive to serious readers interested in how social psychology applies to familiar areas of life, and it is likely to find a place on the reading lists of many future social psychology courses.' - Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology
`Exactly how should textbook writers handle the jangling differences that characterize current scholarship on relationship? Miell, Dallos and their colleagues have admirably taken up this challenge.... The book is an achievement, both for its framework about relationships and for its instructional solution to the task of teaching contrasting theories.... Social Interaction and Personal Relationships succeeds as a textbook that teaches important ideas about interaction and relationships. The text should be seriously considered for any basic undergraduate course on the subject, as it offers an intellectually defensible viewpoint and demonstrates the value of adopting an interdisciplinary stance toward relationship study' - Contemporary Psychology
`This is an extremely attractive book, well produced and well written... beckoning the reader to explore it. A prime aim is to engage the reader "in a debate central not only to academic researchers and clinicians but to their own lives", and it doubtless succeeds in this... The book covers a tremendous range and I found it very impressive... It is aimed not only undergraduates but also a wider, non-academic readership. It is sufficiently interesting and stimulating to attract this wider readership, as well as giving a social psychology overview and context which will be invaluable to students of the subject' - Counselling, The Journal of the British Association for Counselling
`The book offers an exciting and integrated new perspective on relationships that is both thorough and stimulating... I think it is a most successful restructuring of the material that is valuable in itself independently of its obvious merits as a course text' - Steve Duck, University of Iowa
`This excellent book breathes new life into social psychology. It examines how different theoretical perspectives can be brought to bear in understanding everyday social life - relationships between friends, lovers, therapists and clients... But it looks these from the viewpoint not only of standard disciplines like sociology, biology and psychology, but also in the light of systems theory, feminism and other fresh viewpoints' - Jerome Bruner, Tp New York University
Many studies explore when and how young people make sexual choices but few empirical investigations link their sexual motivations with their inner conceptions about their sexual identities. We used multidimensional scaling (MDS) analysis to connect young adult participants’ (N = 128) self-descriptions of
Many studies explore when and how young people make sexual choices but few empirical investigations link their sexual motivations with their inner conceptions about their sexual identities. We used multidimensional scaling (MDS) analysis to connect young adult participants’ (N = 128) self-descriptions of twelve identities to their sexual motivations and ideals. Identities clustered along two semantically distinct dimensions: Dimension 1 was anchored by family identities on one side and non-family identities on the other; Dimension 2 was anchored on one side by friend/romantic relationships and achievement-based social identities on the other. Those who cited intimacy (e.g., sex as an expression of love) and enhancement (e.g., gratification; to feel good) sexual motivations were more likely to describe their sexual identities and gender identities as distinct from other identities, especially for women. Idealizing physically passionate relationships was positively linked to a higher distinction between sexual and non-sexual identities, and between gender and personal identities and family identities. The mental structuring of identities may inform sexual relationship motives, ideals, and expectations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Social and Personal Relationships)
Figure 1
get_app
subject
View online as:
Abstract Page
Full-Text HTML
Open AccessArticle
Stanley Milgram’s Obedience to Authority “Relationship” Condition: Some Methodological and Theoretical Implicationsby
Nestar RussellSoc. Sci. 2014, 3(2), 194-214; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci3020194 - 15 Apr 2014
Cited by 21 | Viewed by 19573In May 1962, social psychologist, Stanley Milgram, ran what was arguably the most controversial variation of his Obedience to Authority (OTA) experiments: the Relationship Condition (RC). In the RC, participants were required to bring a friend, with one becoming the teacher and the
In May 1962, social psychologist, Stanley Milgram, ran what was arguably the most controversial variation of his Obedience to Authority (OTA) experiments: the Relationship Condition (RC). In the RC, participants were required to bring a friend, with one becoming the teacher and the other the learner. The learners were covertly informed that the experiment was actually exploring whether their friend would obey an experimenter’s orders to hurt them. Learners were quickly trained in how to react to the impending “shocks”. Only 15 percent of teachers completed the RC. In an article published in 1965, Milgram discussed most of the variations on his baseline experiment, but only named the RC in passing, promising a more detailed account in his forthcoming book. However, his 1974 book failed to mention the RC and it remained unpublished until François Rochat and Andre Modigliani discovered it in Milgram’s personal archive in 1997 Yale University. Their overview of the RC’s procedure and results left a number of questions unanswered. For example, what were the etiological origins of the RC? Why did Milgram decide against publishing this experiment? And does the RC have any significant methodological or theoretical implications on the Obedience studies discourse? Based on documents obtained from Milgram’s personal archive, the aim of this article is to shed new light on these questions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Social and Personal Relationships)
get_app
subject
View online as:
Abstract Page
Full-Text HTML
Open AccessArticle
Peer Influence and Attraction to Interracial Romantic Relationshipsby
Justin J. Lehmiller, William G. Grazianoand Laura E. VanderDriftSoc. Sci. 2014, 3(1), 115-127; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci3010115 - 19 Feb 2014
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 8252The present research examined the effect of social influence on White, heterosexual individuals’ attraction to targets of varying races (White vs. Black) in two college student samples from the United States (one that leaned politically liberal and one that leaned politically conservative). Using
The present research examined the effect of social influence on White, heterosexual individuals’ attraction to targets of varying races (White vs. Black) in two college student samples from the United States (one that leaned politically liberal and one that leaned politically conservative). Using a within-subjects experimental design, participants were given artificial peer evaluation data (positive, negative, or none) before providing ratings of attractiveness and dating interest for a series of targets. In both samples, positive information was associated with greater levels of attraction and dating interest than negative information, regardless of target race. Within the conservative sample, participants reported greater attraction toward and more dating interest in White targets relative to Black targets, while in the liberal sample, participants’ ratings of targets did not significantly differ from one another. These findings suggest that social influence can affect perceptions of attractiveness even in very different political climates. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Social and Personal Relationships)
get_app
subject
View online as:
Abstract Page
Full-Text HTML
Open AccessArticle
An Instrument to Investigate Expectations about and Experiences of the Parent-Child Relationship: The Parent-Child Relationship Schema Scaleby
Marcia Dixson, Emily Bermesand Suze FairSoc. Sci. 2014, 3(1), 84-114; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci3010084 - 18 Feb 2014
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 7375This paper explains the reasons for and process of creating and testing for reliability and constructing the validity of the Parent-Child Relationship Schema Scale (PCRSS). The instrument is based on the Model of Relationships Survey (MRS). However, where the MRS is an open-ended
This paper explains the reasons for and process of creating and testing for reliability and constructing the validity of the Parent-Child Relationship Schema Scale (PCRSS). The instrument is based on the Model of Relationships Survey (MRS). However, where the MRS is an open-ended survey which takes 20–30 minutes to complete and longer to analyze, the PCRSS is a Likert scale survey which can be completed in less than half the time and offers more sophisticated analysis possibilities as well as new research opportunities. The paper explains the three-stage process used to create the PCRSS and the five tests of reliability and concurrent validity that it “passed”. We also discuss the potential for new areas of research about the parent-child relationship with the PCRSS. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Social and Personal Relationships)
get_app
subject
View online as:
Abstract Page
Full-Text HTML
Open AccessArticle
Coping with Break-Ups: Rebound Relationships and Gender Socializationby
Cassie Shimekand Richard BelloSoc. Sci. 2014, 3(1), 24-43; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci3010024 - 27 Jan 2014
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 19448When serious romantic relationships are terminated, partners are faced with convoluted and complex challenges of detachment from their previous partner, negative feelings about the overall situation, and the need to move forward in life. When faced with this relational upheaval, some individuals employ
When serious romantic relationships are terminated, partners are faced with convoluted and complex challenges of detachment from their previous partner, negative feelings about the overall situation, and the need to move forward in life. When faced with this relational upheaval, some individuals employ and find relief in superficial or noncommittal rebound relationships, which act as a means for coping with the loss of the previous relationship and the severed emotional attachment to an ex-partner, but which are under studied by empirical researchers. In a study of 201 participants, men were predicted and found to be more likely to enter rebound relationships in the aftermath of a relational termination based on lower levels of social support, more emotional attachment to an ex-partner, and displaying the ludus (or trò chơi playing) love style. In addition to the measures of these variables, gender socialization and parental investment theory provide further support for the study’s claims. In sum, rebound relationships were employed by men as a distraction from their feelings of emotional attachment for their ex-partner, but also as a source of support and due to inherent ludic characteristics. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Social and Personal Relationships)
Figure 1
get_app
subject
View online as:
Abstract Page
Full-Text HTML
Open AccessProject Report
Intercorrelations of Intimacy and Identity Dating Goals with Relationship Behaviors and Satisfaction among Young Heterosexual Couplesby
Melanie J. Zimmer-Gembeck, Vanessa Arnholdand Jennifer ConnollySoc. Sci. 2014, 3(1), 44-59; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci3010044 - 29 Jan 2014
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 5220Goals indicate what individuals are working towards in their present lives and what they want to achieve or avoid. In this study of 87 young, unmarried couples (age 17 to 25 years), intimacy and identity dating goals were assessed to investigate couple similarity in goals, associations between personal goals and relationship behaviors, and whether goals and behavior were associated with relationship satisfaction. Couples were similar in their intimacy goals but not their identity goals. As expected, intimacy goals were associated with behaviors when reported by the partner, including greater warmth, autonomy support and structure, and less rejection. One’s own intimacy goals and the positive behaviors of one’s partner, but not one’s own identity goals or the goals of the partner, were uniquely associated with relationship satisfaction. The findings suggest that individual differences in dating goals are relevant to understanding how young people behave with their partners, and why some individuals are more or less satisfied with their relationships. Full article
Why is it important to distinguish between professional and social relationships?
I know it’s important to distinguish between professional and social relationships. What are the key differences between the two relationships? A: It is important to be aware of the differences between professional and social relationships and nurses are accountable for setting appropriate boundaries within these relationships.What are the characteristics of social relations?
Characteristics of social relations Social relationships can be: Materials : They involve some kind of exchange of objects. These are concrete relationships that include those that have links with the economic, the material.What is the difference between a personal relationship and a relationship?
In personal relationships, the level of intimacy is usually higher than in the case of working relationships. In a personal relationship, one can be as sweet or rude as he can be depending on his mood. Personal relationship talks are as varied as the relation, and one can see a wide spectrum of conversations in a husband-wife relationship.What does it mean to be in a relationship?
What you mean by relationship is unique to you, but most people do think of a state of connectedness, especially an emotional connection. In our model, personal relationships refer to close connections between people, formed by emotional bonds and interactions. These bonds often grow from and are strengthened by mutual experiences.What is the meaning social relationship?
Definition. Broadly defined, social relationships refer to the connections that exist between people who have recurring interactions that are perceived by the participants to have personal meaning.What are the importance between personal and social relationship?
Dozens of studies have shown that people who have fulfilling relationships with family, friends and community members are happier, have fewer health problems, and live longer. Scientists have found that connecting with others helps relieve harmful levels of stress.What is an example of a personal relationship?
Examples include companionship, affection, intimacy, attachment, love, friendship, empathy, social respect, solidarity, trust.What is an example of a social relationship?
Examples of social relationships include coworkers, distant relatives, and acquaintances. Another distinction useful for categorizing relationships is whether or not they are voluntary. Tải thêm tài liệu liên quan đến nội dung bài viết What is the difference between social relationship and personal relationship